NYT Opinion Piece on Kashmir
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/19/opinion/india-pakistan-kashmir-jammu.html A New York Times opinion piece by Harsh Shringla talks about the Indian armies invasion of Kashmir. He justifies the invasion through a utilitarian approach. He cites the lack of economic success, regressive laws, and terrorist connections in Kashmir. He believes that an enforced Indian rule over Kashmir would be better for its citizens, therefore it is permissible for India to invade Pakistan. He says "The changes introduced by India have challenged entrenched interests who benefited from the old system at a cost to the people.". He calls it a "introduced change", however it is a military invasion (1). USA today reports the opposite, that " Kashmir is India’s only Muslim-majority state and most people there oppose Indian rule" and " Rebels have been fighting Indian control for decades, and most Kashmiris support the rebels' demand that all of Kashmir be united under Pa...